I'm not sure if I speak for everyone here, but man is it hard to play fantasy football these days. For anyone who's been playing for the past five plus years, you can probably agree with me on this one. NFL teams were structured very differently and thus draft strategies were much more reliable. In the early to mid 2000s a typical NFL offense was basically a quarterback, a running back, two wide receivers and a tight end; simple. No matter which positions you went with first on draft day, there was one thing you could count on: consistency. Your wide receivers were going to get heavily targeted and you could expect your running back, regardless of team, to get 20-30 carries per game, but the game has changed and fantasy rosters everywhere are struggling because of it. Here's my theory on why:
As a result of the increasing concerns with player safety, certain rule changes have been implemented over the past few years to help protect players, particularly players on offense. Since the majority of "defenseless" players happen to be the guys catching high passes in mid-air, many of these rules had a positive effect on passing offense. This is evidenced by the jump in quarterback's passing yardage. In 2011 six quarterbacks threw for more than 4,500 yards, three of which threw for over 5,000 yards with two (Tom Brady and Drew Brees) breaking Dan Marino's single season passing record of 5,084 yards set in 1984. At a glance this seems like a good thing, more passing yards means more wide receiver yardage for fantasy teams, right? Actually, no, that's wrong. Because defensive backs are forced to play receivers more conservatively, the art of getting open in coverage has become less of a necessity. This results in players all over the field having an easier time getting open, not just the studs on the team, and thus the ball is getting spread around to multiple players in an offense.Football offenses are also constantly changing, on both the collegiate and professional level. Since 2000 we have seen the fun-and-gun West Coast offense transform into the gimmicky wildcat offense which eventually paved the way for the spread offense, which many NFL teams are using in some modified way today. Instead of your standard two or three wide receiver sets, coaches are experimenting with four or five wide receiver sets, even lining their running backs up at wide receiver. The increase in the amount of wide receivers on the field at one time decreases the chances of one guy getting the ball, they see less targets. I did a little research and found that in 2006 there were 10 wide receivers who were targeted more than 150 times while in 2011, only 5 wide receivers saw more than 150 targets. This could lead to less yardage, but more importantly, less touchdown production for a particular player.
A prime example would be the Green Bay Packers, a prolific passing offense over the past few years who routinely line up with four or five wide receivers (The Saints would have worked well here too, but since I have Randall Cobb on my fantasy team this year, this example is more relevant to me. Sorry, Black and Gold fans). When they get down into the red zone it is literally anybody's guess on who is going to get the touchdown. This becomes very unfortunate for those who took Greg Jennings in their draft (A top-5 receiver my most accounts).
I know I've been rambling here, but I haven't even mention the running game yet. Running backs have become just as unreliable in terms of consistency. Why, you ask? Because so many teams have started to use multiple guys in the backfield instead of just one solid go-to like in the old days. Even quarterbacks are getting involved in the ground game and are taking away star running backs touches. A perfect example this season would be the Carolina Panthers. The Panthers have such a crowded backfield that it isn't even amusing. Three running backs (De'angelo Williams, Jonathan Stewart and Mike Tolbert) all who have had pronounced success in the league are stuck fighting for carries on a weekly basis. Each one of these guys is good enough to carry a team and be an RB1, but in this situation, they all become essentially worthless. Couple this with the fact that they have one of the best running quarterbacks in the NFL, in Cam Newton (who in addition was essentially the teams goal line back last season) and this becomes a recipe for disaster.
This isn't a unique situation either as the majority of NFL teams have switched to this multi-back system. It is literally a nightmare for fantasy owners. Even the top-rated fantasy running back, Arian Foster is not exempt from this. Last week against the Jacksonville Jaguars, Foster had not one, but two touchdowns taken away from him by his back-up, Ben Tate. In the old days this simply would not be an issue. You knew that your first overall pick (Adrian Peterson, LaDanian Tomlinson, whoever) was going to get the rock and was going to get 90% of the scoring opportunities. The idea of "touchdown vultures" was hardly as real a threat as it is today.
So how do we fix this fantasy foible? The answer might be in switching to a more generic form of drafting, where players take entire offensive units instead of individual players. It's like, we know the Saints and the Packers are going to have great passing offenses, so how about we have "Packers Wide Receivers" as a draft choice. What's that, you say? The Texans have one of the best rushing tandem's in the NFL? Well then I'd sure think about spending my first overall pick on "Texans Running Backs." Problem solved, right? No more chomping on finger nails when its 1st and Goal on the 1-yard line and you see Ben Tate lined up in the backfield instead of Arian Foster, praying that Tate gets hit behind the line of scrimmage. No more restless nights waiting for your waiver claim for Andre Brown to go through because the ever-questionable Amhad Bradshaw went down and is a scratch for the week. Shouldn't fantasy players be rewarded for their preseason team knowledge instead of being hindered by dumb luck? I say, maybe its time to consider it.
Switching to this style of draft format could also help the game reach demographics once though untouchable or help grow ones just catching on. Over the past few years, fantasy football has seen a spike in female participation, that's for sure, but women, for the most part, just don't obsess over sports the way guys do (yes there are exceptions to this rule, but generally speaking, I take this to be true). This has made it difficult to integrate women into the world of fantasy football. Think about it, your girlfriend probably doesn't know who the fourth or fifth wide receiver on a given team is, or who Arian Foster's back up is. If he goes down, shes probably screwed as one of your guy friends will swoop in and claim Ben Tate off waivers. All this is to say, wouldn't interest level's go up if instead we could draft a whole unit? Don't you think your girlfriend would be that much more interested in a game knowing that if the Texans' scored a rushing touchdown she was going to get points instead of reading the back of the jersey to make sure it was her guy? This could lead to significant financial gains for the sport as a result of demographic diversification.

Would this change the way we prepare for drafts? Yes it would, the aspect of "sleepers"(undervalued players who end up having a significant impact on your team) would disappear and the idea of "hand-cuffing" (drafting a teams back-up in case the starter you drafted gets injured) becomes irrelevant. The much loved waiver wire would essentially disappear as well, a sad day for many fantasy lifers. I guess it comes down to weighing the pros and cons of both systems. Would I want to switch to this format? Probably not at the moment, but as the game continues to change and player production becomes more and more of a crap shoot, it might be the only thing saving the beloved faux-sport from extinction.

















